<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><description>Latino 🇲🇽 | An SEO dude, doing SEO things</description><link>https://bsky.app/profile/danitsunami.bsky.social</link><title>@danitsunami.bsky.social - Danitsunami</title><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/danitsunami.bsky.social/post/3mthnwffkdc2s</link><description>@johnmu.com if a set of URLs have a encoded equals sign (=) or a colon (:) in a large product catalog. Will Google deprioritize these URLs over the others since these characters are often associated with query stringed URLs, often found in on-site searches or faceted results?</description><pubDate>19 Aug 2026 21:20 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:353cjw2jrwpfcocadhilx2da/app.bsky.feed.post/3mthnwffkdc2s</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/danitsunami.bsky.social/post/3mqoyqix6ds2o</link><description>@johnmu.com Does Google encode unencoded URLs? If so, will this slow down the crawling, parsing,+ indexing processes at scale. Let&#39;s say a site migrated to millions of unecoded URLs within the same domain, will this elongate the organic recovery process that is often associated with site migrations?</description><pubDate>15 Jul 2026 15:07 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:353cjw2jrwpfcocadhilx2da/app.bsky.feed.post/3mqoyqix6ds2o</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/danitsunami.bsky.social/post/3mooh4xovbc2m</link><description>@johnmu.com I&#39;m noticing that GSC is saying a particular page is not indexed but whenever I do a test search I see the page being indexed in Google search. Any reason why that may be?</description><pubDate>19 Jun 2026 23:01 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:353cjw2jrwpfcocadhilx2da/app.bsky.feed.post/3mooh4xovbc2m</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/danitsunami.bsky.social/post/3mnkm5p5jvk2t</link><description>@johnmu.com any idea why Google Search Console is saying a page is not indexed but when you check in Google, it shows that it is indexed?</description><pubDate>05 Jun 2026 16:55 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:353cjw2jrwpfcocadhilx2da/app.bsky.feed.post/3mnkm5p5jvk2t</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/danitsunami.bsky.social/post/3mmzkuouayk2b</link><description>@johnmu.com Is Google known to replace the &#34;Price&#34; value within the JSON Schema markup if the value itself is not qualified under Google standards? I&#39;m seeing some weirdness in where Google is pulling a number value elsewhere from the page and displaying it as a Product Snippet in search.</description><pubDate>29 May 2026 22:17 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:353cjw2jrwpfcocadhilx2da/app.bsky.feed.post/3mmzkuouayk2b</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/danitsunami.bsky.social/post/3mj3ozag2uk2u</link><description>if we serve a 200 status code page to users with a 404 messaging on the page + meta robots set to noindex, then serve bots a page with a 404 status code with 404 messaging on the page. Will that disrupt anything form SEO lens? @johnmu.com</description><pubDate>09 Apr 2026 20:56 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:353cjw2jrwpfcocadhilx2da/app.bsky.feed.post/3mj3ozag2uk2u</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/danitsunami.bsky.social/post/3mfphgolv2k2e</link><description>@johnmu.com I noticed that Google is crawling UTMs from openai. I&#39;m not sure how Google is able to capture these type of links but I was hoping if you able to provide any additional context around this. This was found in GSC&#39;s &#39;Page Indexing &gt; Alternate page with proper canonical tag&#39; report.</description><pubDate>25 Feb 2026 19:52 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:353cjw2jrwpfcocadhilx2da/app.bsky.feed.post/3mfphgolv2k2e</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/danitsunami.bsky.social/post/3mcdqrm5xi22l</link><description>@johnmu.com If a series of sister brands/websites wants to let their users know that they are related and owned by a lager company and create a partner page to link between each other, will this run the risk of being spammy under Google&#39;s eyes?</description><pubDate>13 Jan 2026 23:52 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:353cjw2jrwpfcocadhilx2da/app.bsky.feed.post/3mcdqrm5xi22l</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/danitsunami.bsky.social/post/3mcasvpcsqs2t</link><description>@johnmu.com Happy new year! I have another SEO question. If a site is on a dynamic rendered setup, with CSR version for users and a SSR for bots. For &#39;not found&#39; pages, will it pose an issue if we are serving a 200 status for the CSR version vs. a 404 status for the SSR version?</description><pubDate>12 Jan 2026 19:52 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:353cjw2jrwpfcocadhilx2da/app.bsky.feed.post/3mcasvpcsqs2t</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/danitsunami.bsky.social/post/3m5f2koyn522j</link><description>@johnmu.com if a non-percent encoded URL has a canonical tag pointing to it&#39;s percent encoded corresponding URL, will that pose an issue with Google?</description><pubDate>11 Nov 2025 21:14 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:353cjw2jrwpfcocadhilx2da/app.bsky.feed.post/3m5f2koyn522j</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/danitsunami.bsky.social/post/3lzm6mj6sa22n</link><description>@johnmu.com Hope all is well. Quick internal link question. Is this setup ideal for Google for a site that has millions of pages? I couldn&#39;t find much documentation around it jsaction.</description><pubDate>24 Sep 2025 19:34 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:353cjw2jrwpfcocadhilx2da/app.bsky.feed.post/3lzm6mj6sa22n</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/danitsunami.bsky.social/post/3lv56jxbyms2z</link><description>@johnmu.com during a site migration, if the final redirect URL for a user contains a parameter that allows us displays special messaging like a modal that tells them they are being redirected. At the same time we are serving redirects to bots to non-parameter versions. Will this cause issues?</description><pubDate>29 Jul 2025 22:42 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:353cjw2jrwpfcocadhilx2da/app.bsky.feed.post/3lv56jxbyms2z</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/danitsunami.bsky.social/post/3lu42xgfyqc24</link><description>@johnmu.com Will this markup work for products in a unauthenticated view in where the price is not available to users and they will need to login (authenticate) to view the pricing information on their end? Let me know your thoughts. https://web.archive.org/web/20240601152625/https://developers.google.com/search/docs/appearance/structured-data/product-snippet#structured-data-type-definitions</description><pubDate>16 Jul 2025 18:40 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:353cjw2jrwpfcocadhilx2da/app.bsky.feed.post/3lu42xgfyqc24</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/danitsunami.bsky.social/post/3lo2jjpykf22q</link><description>@johnmu.com If a promotional banner is above the main navigation consistently across the website will Googlebot see it as part of the MainNav or will be able to differentiate it as not part of the MainNav? For example, Bose&#39;s website has this banner that follows you around:</description><pubDate>30 Apr 2025 19:24 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:353cjw2jrwpfcocadhilx2da/app.bsky.feed.post/3lo2jjpykf22q</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/danitsunami.bsky.social/post/3llcmuqonl22c</link><description>@johnmu.com I saw this canonical setup the other day. Is it still valid for Googlebots? &lt;link rel=&#34;canonical&#34; href=&#34;about:blank&#34;&gt; , which I think it basically means that there is no canonical tag for the page.</description><pubDate>26 Mar 2025 20:30 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:353cjw2jrwpfcocadhilx2da/app.bsky.feed.post/3llcmuqonl22c</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/danitsunami.bsky.social/post/3li6aobbjl22m</link><description>@johnmu.com Does Google favor the meta robots tag over the robots.txt tag in certain conditions? The reason I&#39;m asking is because I&#39;m noticing pages being crawled that contain a &#39;noindex&#39; directive, despite having a disallow directive in the robots.txt.</description><pubDate>14 Feb 2025 22:25 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:353cjw2jrwpfcocadhilx2da/app.bsky.feed.post/3li6aobbjl22m</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/danitsunami.bsky.social/post/3lhf5jp5ra22n</link><description>@johnmu.com when blocking specific URLs via robots.txt that contain text strings like ?q=:&#xA;&#xA;Will it make sense to display the directive in a percent encoded format? For example, in this case, it would be encoded as the following in the robots.txt file: %3Fq%3D%3A</description><pubDate>04 Feb 2025 22:53 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:353cjw2jrwpfcocadhilx2da/app.bsky.feed.post/3lhf5jp5ra22n</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/danitsunami.bsky.social/post/3lhcieo5ecs2r</link><description>@johnmu.com I&#39;ve submitted a XML sitemap file with multiple sitemaps via GSC. Google was able to read the XML file but couldn&#39;t fetch the multiple sitemap files. I&#39;ve read in several forums that this is may be a bug or Google&#39;s way of saying that it hasn&#39;t crawled it yet. Any thoughts?</description><pubDate>03 Feb 2025 21:29 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:353cjw2jrwpfcocadhilx2da/app.bsky.feed.post/3lhcieo5ecs2r</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/danitsunami.bsky.social/post/3lfpueqk5a22x</link><description>@johnmu.com I&#39;m currently working with a ecommerce website&#39;s product schema but the challenge I&#39;m facing is that their products pricing is only available once users are able to log in to their account or get that info upon request. Is there a way to provide valid product schema in this scenario?</description><pubDate>14 Jan 2025 18:18 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:353cjw2jrwpfcocadhilx2da/app.bsky.feed.post/3lfpueqk5a22x</guid></item></channel></rss>