<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><description>Behavioral and information economics are my profession, golf is my game, answering emails is my job.</description><link>https://bsky.app/profile/jdpowers.bsky.social</link><title>@jdpowers.bsky.social - </title><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/jdpowers.bsky.social/post/3ld74xuq6cc2r</link><description>#econsky For those tapped into pre-registration of experiments and empirical projects, what measure is used to determine the quality of a pre-registration submission?&#xA;&#xA;Likelihood of producing a new result? Of replicating an existing result? Of producing a precise estimate? Something else?</description><pubDate>13 Dec 2024 15:46 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:5dkjgbkzmst3gjzleumgxa6j/app.bsky.feed.post/3ld74xuq6cc2r</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/jdpowers.bsky.social/post/3lb6cssreo22l</link><description>Theorists of #econsky &#xA;&#xA;You are looking for analytical conditions for a theoretical result to hold. The conditions exist (because you have a numerical example) but they seem sensitive to several parameters at once in a complicated way. How do to get the best version of the result for the paper?</description><pubDate>17 Nov 2024 21:07 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:5dkjgbkzmst3gjzleumgxa6j/app.bsky.feed.post/3lb6cssreo22l</guid></item></channel></rss>