<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><description>IO Economist @ NYU Stern. https://chrisconlon.github.io</description><link>https://bsky.app/profile/cconlon.bsky.social</link><title>@cconlon.bsky.social - Chris Conlon</title><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/cconlon.bsky.social/post/3ld4puihjls2q</link><description>Unfortunately this is misleading in two ways:&#xA;&#xA;1. Section 12 of the 2010 HMG&#39;s also discussed monopsony power over input providers (including workers)&#xA;&#xA;2. The judge ruled that the FTC did not prove their case re: effects on workers, but was it moot bc they won on product market.&#xA;&#xA;[contains quote post or other embedded content]</description><pubDate>12 Dec 2024 16:46 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:5kpaebd3kh2kcbrchohnmcqq/app.bsky.feed.post/3ld4puihjls2q</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/cconlon.bsky.social/post/3lbrp4pu43s2j</link><description>I think my @nyulaw.bsky.social colleague Daniel Francis provides a clear and balanced summary of the Neo-Brandeis shift in antitrust. &#xA;&#xA;It is worth a read for all IO Economists (and perhaps more importantly macro economists who&#39;ve recently discovered IO).&#xA;https://www.promarket.org/2024/11/25/after-neo-brandeis/</description><pubDate>25 Nov 2024 14:08 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:5kpaebd3kh2kcbrchohnmcqq/app.bsky.feed.post/3lbrp4pu43s2j</guid></item></channel></rss>