<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><description>University Professor, Penn Law &amp; Wharton.  Comments occasionally on antitrust issues and follows news, public law, economics, and legal history.  See my substack &#34;The Monopoly Problem&#34; https://herbhovenkamp.substack.com/</description><link>https://bsky.app/profile/sherman1890.bsky.social</link><title>@sherman1890.bsky.social - Herb Hovenkamp</title><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/sherman1890.bsky.social/post/3mu4taxxkxc2t</link><description>Nunn (2026) says Antitrust Law is 17th most cited scholarly work at the S.Ct, 4X as many as Bork&#39;s Antitrust Paradox; one below Farrand&#39;s Constitutional Convention.  Blackstone&#39;s commentaries is #1. The list is sortable by date, subject matter, author. https://nunn.law/scotus?mode=most_cited</description><pubDate>28 Aug 2026 07:21 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:5omrydccecgnknch6zmbmasc/app.bsky.feed.post/3mu4taxxkxc2t</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/sherman1890.bsky.social/post/3mu2nmoy3ak2v</link><description>As school is starting up again please think about my free substack &#34;The Monopoly Problem,&#34; discussing important developments in antitrust, its movements, metrics and rules, as well as its weaknesses and errors.  herbhovenkamp.substack.com&#xA;https://herbhovenkamp.substack.com/</description><pubDate>27 Aug 2026 10:35 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:5omrydccecgnknch6zmbmasc/app.bsky.feed.post/3mu2nmoy3ak2v</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/sherman1890.bsky.social/post/3mtyardqctc2z</link><description>This morning in “The Monopoly Problem:” does antitrust have any role in the anxiety that results from rapid technological change, including the rise of extremist views and populist overreactions. https://herbhovenkamp.substack.com/p/innovation-shock</description><pubDate>26 Aug 2026 11:40 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:5omrydccecgnknch6zmbmasc/app.bsky.feed.post/3mtyardqctc2z</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/sherman1890.bsky.social/post/3mtqwmjjnhs24</link><description>“The Monopoly Problem” this morning posts about the Delta decision. While antitrust merger law forbids balancing gains and losses in different markets, the Transportation Department’s approach requires it and grants an antitrust immunity. https://herbhovenkamp.substack.com/p/airline-joint-ventures-and-the-single</description><pubDate>23 Aug 2026 13:49 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:5omrydccecgnknch6zmbmasc/app.bsky.feed.post/3mtqwmjjnhs24</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/sherman1890.bsky.social/post/3mtofngd7hc2c</link><description>This morning’s post in “The Monopoly Problem” considers the nature and scope of cost savings or product improvements that result from mergers; should there be an “efficiency defense” in merger cases?  https://herbhovenkamp.substack.com/p/antitrust-and-mergers-efficiencies</description><pubDate>22 Aug 2026 13:40 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:5omrydccecgnknch6zmbmasc/app.bsky.feed.post/3mtofngd7hc2c</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/sherman1890.bsky.social/post/3mtgrhnndcc2u</link><description>“The Monopoly Problem” post this morning discusses the relevance of economics to antitrust analysis, including the history of its use, questions about whether it is essential, and the type of economics that the antitrust laws employ. https://substack.com/home/post/p-211473404</description><pubDate>19 Aug 2026 12:51 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:5omrydccecgnknch6zmbmasc/app.bsky.feed.post/3mtgrhnndcc2u</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/sherman1890.bsky.social/post/3mt57icjr3k2k</link><description>my article on antitrust&#39;s &#34;breakup obsession&#34; is coming out in Journal of Corp Law.  This dog deserved to die a long time ago.  https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6243659</description><pubDate>15 Aug 2026 17:35 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:5omrydccecgnknch6zmbmasc/app.bsky.feed.post/3mt57icjr3k2k</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/sherman1890.bsky.social/post/3mt4pgb6t4c2j</link><description>My latest post in “The Monopoly Problem” was motivated by the 9th Circuit’s recent Surgical Instrument decision. It considers the role of behavioral economics and limitations on customer knowledge in identifying the sources of monopoly power. https://substack.com/home/post/p-211239100</description><pubDate>15 Aug 2026 12:47 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:5omrydccecgnknch6zmbmasc/app.bsky.feed.post/3mt4pgb6t4c2j</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/sherman1890.bsky.social/post/3msxpy6lpyk2z</link><description>AOC recently responded to an Apple price increase announcement by saying it must be broken up. This morning’s “Monopoly Problem” contribution examines the problematic issue of when a monopolist should be broken up because of its antitrust violations. https://substack.com/home/post/p-210276796</description><pubDate>13 Aug 2026 13:14 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:5omrydccecgnknch6zmbmasc/app.bsky.feed.post/3msxpy6lpyk2z</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/sherman1890.bsky.social/post/3msnlzbsgns2d</link><description>This morning’s “Monopoly Problem” post considers one Supreme Court attempt to simplify merger litigation: the “Philadelphia Bank Presumption” -- a merger creating a firm whose market share exceeds 30% is unlawful. It’s not perfect but has some virtues. https://substack.com/home/post/p-209118848</description><pubDate>09 Aug 2026 12:37 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:5omrydccecgnknch6zmbmasc/app.bsky.feed.post/3msnlzbsgns2d</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/sherman1890.bsky.social/post/3msb3i7tkv22s</link><description>This morning’s “Monopoly Problem” post inquires whether antitrust analysis of mergers has become too complex, considers market concentration as a merger metric, and examines how the Brown Shoe decision used it.  https://substack.com/home/post/p-209108172.</description><pubDate>04 Aug 2026 13:09 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:5omrydccecgnknch6zmbmasc/app.bsky.feed.post/3msb3i7tkv22s</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/sherman1890.bsky.social/post/3mruiagazmk26</link><description>This morning my “The Monopoly Problem” substack posted about a promising new appellate decision on anticompetitive algorithmic pricing.  The decision creates a conflict in the federal circuit courts, which may motivate the Supreme Court to review it. https://substack.com/home/post/p-209085683</description><pubDate>30 Jul 2026 12:52 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:5omrydccecgnknch6zmbmasc/app.bsky.feed.post/3mruiagazmk26</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/sherman1890.bsky.social/post/3mrshrraso22a</link><description>After my July 29 post on algorithmic price fixing in &#34;The Monopoly Problem&#34; the 3d Circuit issued a very promising decision on pricing software used by Caesar&#39;s, Harrah&#39;s, Tropicana and other Atlantic City hotel-casinos.  I&#39;ll post more about it tomorrow.  https://assets.alm.com/01/1b/9c698b594e9ca455a3da444dacc2/003015365160.pdf</description><pubDate>29 Jul 2026 17:39 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:5omrydccecgnknch6zmbmasc/app.bsky.feed.post/3mrshrraso22a</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/sherman1890.bsky.social/post/3mrs3cxb5d22w</link><description>My morning article in “The Monopoly Problem” examines the messy, unproductive way that the courts have been handling cases that involve algorithmic price fixing. It does not have to be as hard as they make it.  https://substack.com/home/post/p-206693479</description><pubDate>29 Jul 2026 13:56 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:5omrydccecgnknch6zmbmasc/app.bsky.feed.post/3mrs3cxb5d22w</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/sherman1890.bsky.social/post/3mrcuy5kumc2c</link><description>My substack, “the monopoly problem,” just posted a piece on antitrust and vertical integration by ownership or contract – its promises, competitive threats, and how to assess them.  https://substack.com/home/post/p-206727704</description><pubDate>23 Jul 2026 12:52 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:5omrydccecgnknch6zmbmasc/app.bsky.feed.post/3mrcuy5kumc2c</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/sherman1890.bsky.social/post/3mr7zhwtwlc2v</link><description>My new piece in Promarket examines the relationship among the proposed American Innovation Choice Online Act (AICOA), revised, antitrust law, and industrial policy.  https://www.promarket.org/2026/07/21/aicoa-ii-is-americas-reverse-industrial-policy-initiative/</description><pubDate>22 Jul 2026 09:35 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:5omrydccecgnknch6zmbmasc/app.bsky.feed.post/3mr7zhwtwlc2v</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/sherman1890.bsky.social/post/3mr6zgi55wk2c</link><description>This is why university faculty have been moving away from GOP. The movement has been by GOP&#xA;&#xA;[contains quote post or other embedded content]</description><pubDate>22 Jul 2026 00:01 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:5omrydccecgnknch6zmbmasc/app.bsky.feed.post/3mr6zgi55wk2c</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/sherman1890.bsky.social/post/3mr5r5ikcok2c</link><description>This morning “The Monopoly Problem” includes a post on yesterday’s Paramount merger decision.  Hardly the end of this case, but the state Attorneys General have some reason to be hopeful.  https://substack.com/home/post/p-207901811</description><pubDate>21 Jul 2026 12:01 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:5omrydccecgnknch6zmbmasc/app.bsky.feed.post/3mr5r5ikcok2c</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/sherman1890.bsky.social/post/3mr2xijztlk2a</link><description>Prominent post-Chicago antitrust economist Steve Salop (G-Town) has performed a great service -- a guide to antitrust and modern economics -- free in .pdf or an inexpensive Amazon Paperback. You dont need much economics in order to read it.  econantitrustguide.com&#xA;https://econantitrustguide.com/</description><pubDate>20 Jul 2026 09:16 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:5omrydccecgnknch6zmbmasc/app.bsky.feed.post/3mr2xijztlk2a</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/sherman1890.bsky.social/post/3mqrb4owczs2w</link><description>The third of my 3-part discussion of the Robinson-Patman Act in &#34;The Monopoly Problem&#34; considers possibilities for reform.  Subscription is free.  https://substack.com/home/post/p-206468483</description><pubDate>16 Jul 2026 12:42 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:5omrydccecgnknch6zmbmasc/app.bsky.feed.post/3mqrb4owczs2w</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/sherman1890.bsky.social/post/3mqeqmrncqc2f</link><description>This morning my substack “The Monopoly Problem” posted the second in a series – “How Does the Robinson-Patman Act Work? A third post, in a few days, discusses reform possibilities. https://herbhovenkamp.substack.com/p/how-does-the-robinson-patman-act</description><pubDate>11 Jul 2026 13:15 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:5omrydccecgnknch6zmbmasc/app.bsky.feed.post/3mqeqmrncqc2f</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/sherman1890.bsky.social/post/3mptmfqellk2x</link><description>This post in The Monopoly Problem, &#34;The Salesman, the Housewife, and the Campaign Against Low Prices,&#34; is part of a 3-part series on the Robinson-Patman Act. Coming next: how the RPA works, and then, whether it can be reformed.  https://substack.com/home/post/p-202831546</description><pubDate>04 Jul 2026 17:44 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:5omrydccecgnknch6zmbmasc/app.bsky.feed.post/3mptmfqellk2x</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/sherman1890.bsky.social/post/3mpm2hrc6fs2x</link><description>My new post in “The Monopoly Problem”  frets about Trump v. Slaughter as a threat to FTC independence, and wonders what the Agency will look like now and how it can be fixed.  https://substack.com/home/post/p-204254593</description><pubDate>01 Jul 2026 17:34 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:5omrydccecgnknch6zmbmasc/app.bsky.feed.post/3mpm2hrc6fs2x</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/sherman1890.bsky.social/post/3mpiuyea74k2i</link><description>I argue in “The Monopoly Problem” that antitrust’s rule of reason is not so open ended that it violates the rule of law, but only if the courts keep it within its intended boundaries. https://substack.com/home/post/p-204087032</description><pubDate>30 Jun 2026 11:18 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:5omrydccecgnknch6zmbmasc/app.bsky.feed.post/3mpiuyea74k2i</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/sherman1890.bsky.social/post/3mpiiwghi4s22</link><description>Posting from Scotland, so sorry about the hour. Here I argue in “The Monopoly Problem” that antitrust’s rule of reason is not so open ended that it violates the rule of law, provided that the courts keep it within its intended boundaries. substack.com/@herbhovenkamp&#xA;https://substack.com/@herbhovenkamp</description><pubDate>30 Jun 2026 07:42 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:5omrydccecgnknch6zmbmasc/app.bsky.feed.post/3mpiiwghi4s22</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/sherman1890.bsky.social/post/3mpg7q4mkq22e</link><description>tomorrow (June 30) I will be posting on whether antitrust law&#39;s rule of reason violates the rule of law.  Subscriptions to my substack, &#34;The Monopoly Problem,&#34; are free: substack.com/@herbhovenkamp.&#xA;https://substack.com/@herbhovenkamp</description><pubDate>29 Jun 2026 09:52 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:5omrydccecgnknch6zmbmasc/app.bsky.feed.post/3mpg7q4mkq22e</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/sherman1890.bsky.social/post/3mpbc27hnnc2m</link><description>This new post in “The Monopoly Problem” shows that market concentration remains important to antitrust policy, but not as important as hard core structuralists once imagined. Subscribe for free: https://substack.com/home/post/p-202756016</description><pubDate>27 Jun 2026 10:51 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:5omrydccecgnknch6zmbmasc/app.bsky.feed.post/3mpbc27hnnc2m</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/sherman1890.bsky.social/post/3mozxxe7nz22z</link><description>My first of two  posts on market concentration and its link to bad results examines how U.S. antitrust policy came to be concerned about it. Subscription is free: https://substack.com/home/post/p-202709675</description><pubDate>24 Jun 2026 13:01 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:5omrydccecgnknch6zmbmasc/app.bsky.feed.post/3mozxxe7nz22z</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/sherman1890.bsky.social/post/3mousxckcws2y</link><description>Here is my new paper commemorating the 50th anniversary of Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) pre-merger notification, which was intended to be enforcement neutral, and assessing its effectiveness.  Comments welcome.  https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6977058</description><pubDate>22 Jun 2026 11:49 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:5omrydccecgnknch6zmbmasc/app.bsky.feed.post/3mousxckcws2y</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/sherman1890.bsky.social/post/3mounnayvdk2e</link><description>although &#34;market failure&#34; is defined so broadly as to be practically useless.  Nearly NO markets provide as much of things as someone might want..&#xA;&#xA;[contains quote post or other embedded content]</description><pubDate>22 Jun 2026 10:13 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:5omrydccecgnknch6zmbmasc/app.bsky.feed.post/3mounnayvdk2e</guid></item></channel></rss>