<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><link>https://bsky.app/profile/djtunnicliffe.bsky.social</link><title>@djtunnicliffe.bsky.social - David Tunnicliffe</title><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/djtunnicliffe.bsky.social/post/3mnpahkucz22n</link><description>Our take on the review that shaped the US policy response to paracetamol in pregnancy.&#xA;&#xA;Applying evidence‑based medicine standards, we show how selective reporting + methodological flaws led to overreach and confusion.&#xA;&#xA;[contains quote post or other embedded content]</description><pubDate>07 Jun 2026 13:09 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:7o7lkdpqzxzr7a6tfbptdni3/app.bsky.feed.post/3mnpahkucz22n</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/djtunnicliffe.bsky.social/post/3mlukjq2f3c2t</link><description>How we review evidence shapes how we interpret it.&#xA;New commentary in @theMJA: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.5694/mja2.70203&#xA;&#xA;From a journal club at the Centre for Kidney Research on how review methods influence certainty, and what that means for claims linking paracetamol and neurodevelopmental outcomes.</description><pubDate>15 May 2026 05:02 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:7o7lkdpqzxzr7a6tfbptdni3/app.bsky.feed.post/3mlukjq2f3c2t</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/djtunnicliffe.bsky.social/post/3ma2yuq5pds2a</link><description>Are nephrology trials getting better?&#xA;Our new study of 3,083 RCTs from Cochrane reviews shows modest improvements in bias—mostly due to better reporting.&#xA;&#xA;Read more: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xkme.2025.101152&#xA;#Nephrology #RCTs #EvidenceBasedMedicine</description><pubDate>16 Dec 2025 01:33 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:7o7lkdpqzxzr7a6tfbptdni3/app.bsky.feed.post/3ma2yuq5pds2a</guid></item></channel></rss>