<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><description>PhD candidate in philosophy at New York University.</description><link>https://bsky.app/profile/stephanpohl.bsky.social</link><title>@stephanpohl.bsky.social - Stephan Pohl</title><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/stephanpohl.bsky.social/post/3mpqtffk5y22g</link><description>Grateful for the chance to clarify our framework: our reply to Overgaard &amp; Kirkeby-Hinrup&#39;s &#34;Boundary issues for multidimensional frameworks of representation&#34; — a comment on our Perspective on the conceptual dimensions of representation, in Nature Reviews Neuroscience: rdcu.be/frSNr (1/3)</description><pubDate>03 Jul 2026 15:11 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:abpm23d3em7pfqpp6qliuib3/app.bsky.feed.post/3mpqtffk5y22g</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/stephanpohl.bsky.social/post/3mhj3jodgs22k</link><description>What does it take to show the brain represents something? We offer a framework that brings conceptual clarity to representation, systematizing how decoding, encoding, RSA, etc. bear on that question. This makes explicit what findings establish and where interpretations go too far.&#xA;&#xA;[contains quote post or other embedded content]</description><pubDate>20 Mar 2026 17:54 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:abpm23d3em7pfqpp6qliuib3/app.bsky.feed.post/3mhj3jodgs22k</guid></item></channel></rss>