<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><description>Computational cognitive neuroscientist at Adelaide University | Perception, Attention, Learning and Memory Lab (https://palm-lab.github.io) | Open Practices Editor at Attention, Perception, &amp; Psychophysics | ReproducibiliTea | http://williamngiam.github.io</description><link>https://bsky.app/profile/williamngiam.github.io</link><title>@williamngiam.github.io - William Ngiam | 严祥全</title><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/williamngiam.github.io/post/3my44nyvuvs2g</link><description>Researchers ought to operate at the level of theory and phenomena, rather than papers! A more fruitful replication would target the most precise measurement of the effect, over the original study design that discovered the effect (unless they are one and the same!). But..&#xA;&#xA;(Context in quote below)&#xA;&#xA;[contains quote post or other embedded content]</description><pubDate>17 Oct 2026 22:18 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:fphyd74n334fzekttbltle2f/app.bsky.feed.post/3my44nyvuvs2g</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/williamngiam.github.io/post/3mxtjt7osqk22</link><description>Worth reading the developing thread below! I&#39;ve been thinking along similar lines, but instead of more labels, I have been thinking moreso in a mathematical modelling framework: what we consider a &#34;representation&#34; and what we consider a &#34;process&#34; (partly inspired by Grace&#39;s book Models of the Mind!)&#xA;&#xA;[contains quote post or other embedded content]</description><pubDate>14 Oct 2026 12:19 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:fphyd74n334fzekttbltle2f/app.bsky.feed.post/3mxtjt7osqk22</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/williamngiam.github.io/post/3mx6qp5duy22k</link><description>Tired: Complaining that your manuscript is not finding its rightful home amongst prestige journals.&#xA;&#xA;Wired: Saying you&#39;re in scientific publishing ELO hell.</description><pubDate>06 Oct 2026 05:56 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:fphyd74n334fzekttbltle2f/app.bsky.feed.post/3mx6qp5duy22k</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/williamngiam.github.io/post/3mx2amnyuls2h</link><description>As part of data checks at AP&amp;P, I have been asking authors to report their contributions using CRediT (credit.niso.org) and the easy-to-use tenzing (rollercoaster.shinyapps.io/tenzing/). I&#39;ve wondered if this has nudged more collaboration (and perhaps PIs reflecting on their role in the work)...&#xA;https://rollercoaster.shinyapps.io/tenzing/</description><pubDate>04 Oct 2026 10:58 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:fphyd74n334fzekttbltle2f/app.bsky.feed.post/3mx2amnyuls2h</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/williamngiam.github.io/post/3mwdfo3fo6s2v</link><description>The @reproducibilitea.org conference is starting now!&#xA;&#xA;[contains quote post or other embedded content]</description><pubDate>25 Sep 2026 08:57 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:fphyd74n334fzekttbltle2f/app.bsky.feed.post/3mwdfo3fo6s2v</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/williamngiam.github.io/post/3mvtv6mkq4s26</link><description>Check out the reusability checker ShinyApp! It&#39;s very useful for making sure your data repositories are in good condition before the upcoming read-only freeze of OSF repositories.&#xA;&#xA;[contains quote post or other embedded content]</description><pubDate>19 Sep 2026 04:52 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:fphyd74n334fzekttbltle2f/app.bsky.feed.post/3mvtv6mkq4s26</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/williamngiam.github.io/post/3mvtondgopc2e</link><description>📅 Make sure that you have the ReproducibiliTea conference marked in your calendars on Friday! I will be chairing the first session where we look at some of the issues around computational reproducibility including statistical interpretation, sleuthing and review, and dissemination. Link below👇&#xA;https://reproducibilitea.org/session-1</description><pubDate>19 Sep 2026 02:55 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:fphyd74n334fzekttbltle2f/app.bsky.feed.post/3mvtondgopc2e</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/williamngiam.github.io/post/3mvrkthqo6c2q</link><description>If psychological judgments of similarity are non-metric (Tversky, 1977), and we are evaluating similarity of neural representations by using metric spaces (like Procrustes distance), then how does that mismatch get resolved for neural representations of similarity?</description><pubDate>18 Sep 2026 06:42 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:fphyd74n334fzekttbltle2f/app.bsky.feed.post/3mvrkthqo6c2q</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/williamngiam.github.io/post/3mvepztw55225</link><description>Can we put OpenAI/Anthropic/etc. through any Institutional Review Board / Research Ethics Committee? It would be so fun to watch them implode from all the administrative barriers and minutiae they have to get through to do their &#34;research&#34; (let alone address all the actual ethical issues).</description><pubDate>13 Sep 2026 04:10 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:fphyd74n334fzekttbltle2f/app.bsky.feed.post/3mvepztw55225</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/williamngiam.github.io/post/3mug6f5ctd22x</link><description>More like Dan &#34;uh-really?&#34; amirite</description><pubDate>01 Sep 2026 00:34 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:fphyd74n334fzekttbltle2f/app.bsky.feed.post/3mug6f5ctd22x</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/williamngiam.github.io/post/3mtvbq63ig22f</link><description>Which causes more distress: the cold pressor test or getting a manuscript rejected after the second round of reviews?</description><pubDate>25 Aug 2026 07:19 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:fphyd74n334fzekttbltle2f/app.bsky.feed.post/3mtvbq63ig22f</guid></item></channel></rss>