<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><description>Professor, Lewis &amp; Clark Law School. Teach constitutional law and torts, write on religious liberty and equal protection.</description><link>https://bsky.app/profile/jimoleske.bsky.social</link><title>@jimoleske.bsky.social - Jim Oleske</title><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/jimoleske.bsky.social/post/3mvnzi5f3os2e</link><description>With today&#39;s filing of Petitioners&#39; reply, briefing is now complete in St. Mary v. Roy (oral argument Nov. 3).&#xA;&#xA;Notably missing from Petitioners&#39; reply, and from 7-minute video Becket recently released: any mention of the specific conduct Petitioners&#39; claim a right to engage in using state funds.&#xA;&#xA;[contains quote post or other embedded content]</description><pubDate>16 Sep 2026 20:53 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:iv73mapy52ilxfjnetqatnvu/app.bsky.feed.post/3mvnzi5f3os2e</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/jimoleske.bsky.social/post/3mvgljgagr22x</link><description>Also notable is Part II of this concurrence.&#xA;&#xA;Claims Smith is inconsistent with &#34;original meaning&#34; of FEC and contrary to 14A-era history and tradition, but offers *no* analysis of &#34;shall make no law&#34; language and ignores consistent rejection of exemption rights b/n 1868 and 1963. &#xA;&#xA;See 151-69 here:&#xA;&#xA;[contains quote post or other embedded content]</description><pubDate>13 Sep 2026 21:55 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:iv73mapy52ilxfjnetqatnvu/app.bsky.feed.post/3mvgljgagr22x</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/jimoleske.bsky.social/post/3mv43yvdeb227</link><description>First seven songs from Philadelphia concert.&#xA;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ph7SZcdIK0E</description><pubDate>09 Sep 2026 17:50 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:iv73mapy52ilxfjnetqatnvu/app.bsky.feed.post/3mv43yvdeb227</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/jimoleske.bsky.social/post/3mv43ibhpe226</link><description>Two add&#39;l notes:&#xA;&#xA;1. RFRAs are designed to restore a constitutional exemption regime created by Justice Brennan in 1963 that was never rooted in history.&#xA;&#xA;2. Impossible to see principled cabining of state RFRA claims &amp; Tandon claims that precludes claims in abortion cases but not vaccine cases.&#xA;&#xA;[contains quote post or other embedded content]</description><pubDate>09 Sep 2026 17:41 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:iv73mapy52ilxfjnetqatnvu/app.bsky.feed.post/3mv43ibhpe226</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/jimoleske.bsky.social/post/3muzbloyrmk24</link><description>A reminder of how a professor at one of those &#34;civic education centers established by Republican state lawmakers&#34; has contributed to civil discourse over the past year. (Yes, this professor is still employed at Ohio State, seven months after the incident.)&#xA;&#xA;[contains quote post or other embedded content]</description><pubDate>08 Sep 2026 14:52 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:iv73mapy52ilxfjnetqatnvu/app.bsky.feed.post/3muzbloyrmk24</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/jimoleske.bsky.social/post/3mtw5ysfrhs2m</link><description>My symposium essay on three recent Supreme Court cases involving the interests of LGBTQ people has been published in final form.&#xA;&#xA;Many thanks to @lauraportuondo.bsky.social for the invitation to participate, @profjdnelson.bsky.social for the excellent comments, and the student editors at HJHLP.&#xA;https://houstonhealthlaw.scholasticahq.com/article/168216-mahmoud-skrmetti-and-303-creative-ignoring-original-meaning-rewriting-precedent-and-discounting-harm-to-lgbtq-people</description><pubDate>25 Aug 2026 15:45 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:iv73mapy52ilxfjnetqatnvu/app.bsky.feed.post/3mtw5ysfrhs2m</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/jimoleske.bsky.social/post/3mtu6ghngmc2u</link><description>1/ When religious schools choose to participate in a taxpayer-funded, universal pre-K program, can they be required to comply with the program’s nondiscrimination rule?&#xA;&#xA;Or do the schools have a constitutional right to discriminate against preschoolers whose parents are gay?&#xA;&#xA;That&#39;s the question …</description><pubDate>24 Aug 2026 20:47 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:iv73mapy52ilxfjnetqatnvu/app.bsky.feed.post/3mtu6ghngmc2u</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/jimoleske.bsky.social/post/3mtu6ghngmc2u</link><description>1/ When religious schools choose to participate in a taxpayer-funded, universal pre-K program, can they be required to comply with the program’s nondiscrimination rule?&#xA;&#xA;Or do the schools have a constitutional right to discriminate against preschoolers whose parents are gay?&#xA;&#xA;That&#39;s the question …</description><pubDate>24 Aug 2026 20:47 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:iv73mapy52ilxfjnetqatnvu/app.bsky.feed.post/3mtu6ghngmc2u</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/jimoleske.bsky.social/post/3mtpkfhvzfk2c</link><description>Re-upping in advance of some related posting tomorrow ...&#xA;&#xA;[contains quote post or other embedded content]</description><pubDate>23 Aug 2026 00:38 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:iv73mapy52ilxfjnetqatnvu/app.bsky.feed.post/3mtpkfhvzfk2c</guid></item></channel></rss>