<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><description>Science journo at @science.org, writing about science &amp; society, research integrity, and other places where the scientific rubber hits the road. 🇿🇦🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🇷🇸&#xA;&#xA;Tip? Find me on Signal at cathleen_ogrady.14</description><link>https://bsky.app/profile/cathleenogrady.bsky.social</link><title>@cathleenogrady.bsky.social - Cathleen O&#39;Grady</title><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/cathleenogrady.bsky.social/post/3lptydjl6ek2l</link><description>Last week, a preprint reporting expert consensus on smartphones and teen mental health sparked a kerfuffle. &#xA;&#xA;Critics are saying the evidence in the field is too thin to support consensus, and that the findings of the paper have been communicated badly: https://www.science.org/content/article/social-media-consensus-paper-causes-social-media-uproar</description><pubDate>23 May 2025 15:51 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:jzzphuxllummtl6ydgd56db5/app.bsky.feed.post/3lptydjl6ek2l</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/cathleenogrady.bsky.social/post/3lp7nykqab22e</link><description>A massive health dataset has spawned a wealth of cookie-cutter &#34;research Mad Libs&#34; papers that don&#39;t tell us anything useful, but flood the literature with noise. Possibly AI-generated, possibly paper mill origin.&#xA;&#xA;https://www.science.org/content/article/low-quality-papers-are-surging-exploiting-public-data-sets-and-ai</description><pubDate>15 May 2025 13:53 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:jzzphuxllummtl6ydgd56db5/app.bsky.feed.post/3lp7nykqab22e</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/cathleenogrady.bsky.social/post/3llygvnhp2k2w</link><description>Smart and important story from @rebekahwhite.bsky.social. Some geoengineering experiments have brought nearby communities on board; others have failed to get support. What should scientists do to genuinely engage with people about their concerns?&#xA;&#xA;https://www.science.org/content/article/geoengineering-fight-climate-change-if-public-can-convinced</description><pubDate>04 Apr 2025 12:42 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:jzzphuxllummtl6ydgd56db5/app.bsky.feed.post/3llygvnhp2k2w</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/cathleenogrady.bsky.social/post/3lksnydbhjk25</link><description>This is awesome: &#34;As we incorporated [ASL vocab] into the course, we found that students who relied solely on an interpreter started to outperform hearing students ... Deaf students also began to seek out research opportunities more often than they did previously.&#34;&#xA;&#xA;https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-00738-w</description><pubDate>20 Mar 2025 12:07 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:jzzphuxllummtl6ydgd56db5/app.bsky.feed.post/3lksnydbhjk25</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/cathleenogrady.bsky.social/post/3lkduucgsi22j</link><description>Language is the social&amp;cognitive air that humans breathe. It underlies our thinking, connection, education. &#xA;&#xA;So what happens when, as a young child, you don&#39;t get access to it?  &#xA;&#xA;Implants can help deaf kids hear – but that&#39;s not always enough to give them language 🧪&#xA;https://www.science.org/content/article/implants-can-help-deaf-kids-hear-many-still-struggle-spoken-language</description><pubDate>14 Mar 2025 15:00 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:jzzphuxllummtl6ydgd56db5/app.bsky.feed.post/3lkduucgsi22j</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/cathleenogrady.bsky.social/post/3lkduucgsi22j</link><description>Language is the social&amp;cognitive air that humans breathe. It underlies our thinking, connection, education. &#xA;&#xA;So what happens when, as a young child, you don&#39;t get access to it?  &#xA;&#xA;Implants can help deaf kids hear – but that&#39;s not always enough to give them language 🧪&#xA;https://www.science.org/content/article/implants-can-help-deaf-kids-hear-many-still-struggle-spoken-language</description><pubDate>14 Mar 2025 15:00 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:jzzphuxllummtl6ydgd56db5/app.bsky.feed.post/3lkduucgsi22j</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/cathleenogrady.bsky.social/post/3lj65kkdefk2o</link><description>Great thread from @jbakcoleman.bsky.social on my story about ecologists reaching different conclusions from the same data. Should we be worried? Maybe about analytical ability – but maybe not so much about science&#39;s ability to reach a clear answer. 🧪&#xA;&#xA;[contains quote post or other embedded content]</description><pubDate>27 Feb 2025 14:55 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:jzzphuxllummtl6ydgd56db5/app.bsky.feed.post/3lj65kkdefk2o</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/cathleenogrady.bsky.social/post/3lip3ozpnr22r</link><description>One of the wackier stories I&#39;ve reported in a while. Shady outfits are selling slots on UK &#34;patents&#34; to academics – only they aren&#39;t patents, they&#39;re just cribbed pictures of crazy, meaningless designs:&#xA;&#xA;[contains quote post or other embedded content]</description><pubDate>21 Feb 2025 15:12 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:jzzphuxllummtl6ydgd56db5/app.bsky.feed.post/3lip3ozpnr22r</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/cathleenogrady.bsky.social/post/3ldo3cmmvs225</link><description>Scientists are protesting a move from the UK Medical Research Council that could spell the end of historic research units focusing on areas of strategic national importance, such as epidemiology, toxicology, and virology:&#xA;&#xA;https://www.science.org/content/article/funding-overhaul-threatens-historic-u-k-research-units</description><pubDate>19 Dec 2024 14:26 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:jzzphuxllummtl6ydgd56db5/app.bsky.feed.post/3ldo3cmmvs225</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/cathleenogrady.bsky.social/post/3ldjepxics223</link><description>It took four days from submission to publication, and nearly five years from publication to retraction. After campaigning by many, many scientists, and an investigation by Elsevier, an infamous paper on hydroxychloroquine as a COVID-19 treatment has been retracted. 🧪&#xA;https://www.science.org/content/article/infamous-paper-popularized-unproven-covid-19-treatment-finally-retracted?utm_campaign=Science&amp;utm_medium=ownedSocial&amp;utm_source=Bluesky</description><pubDate>17 Dec 2024 17:31 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:jzzphuxllummtl6ydgd56db5/app.bsky.feed.post/3ldjepxics223</guid></item></channel></rss>