<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><description>Carroll Professor at Georgetown Law&#xA;https://www.law.georgetown.edu/faculty/john-mikhail/</description><link>https://bsky.app/profile/johnmikhail.bsky.social</link><title>@johnmikhail.bsky.social - John Mikhail</title><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/johnmikhail.bsky.social/post/3lk7l2sabfk2e</link><description>“Indeed, despite its rare use, section 237(a)(4)(C) has already been found unconstitutional by a federal court” on the grounds of “‘void for vagueness,’ a violation of due process.”&#xA;&#xA;Yes. And the judge who wrote that opinion was Maryanne Trump Barry - Donald Trump’s eldest sister.&#xA;&#xA;[contains quote post or other embedded content]</description><pubDate>12 Mar 2025 21:54 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:lsddeeldcm3xmeh35bjcfwu5/app.bsky.feed.post/3lk7l2sabfk2e</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/johnmikhail.bsky.social/post/3lif67ha7oc2r</link><description>Agreed. B&amp;W are basically reading the 14A as if it said:&#xA;&#xA;“All persons born…in the United States and [whose parents are] subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States….”&#xA;&#xA;This isn’t good originalism/textualism, nor is it consistent with the history of birthright citizenship.&#xA;&#xA;[contains quote post or other embedded content]</description><pubDate>17 Feb 2025 16:30 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:lsddeeldcm3xmeh35bjcfwu5/app.bsky.feed.post/3lif67ha7oc2r</guid></item></channel></rss>