<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><description>Science Journalist. &#xA;LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/dalmeet-singh-chawla-287a0653/&#xA;Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@Dalmeet&#xA;Muckrack: https://muckrack.com/dalmeet-singh-chawla/articles&#xA;Anonymous Tips: dalmeet@protonmail.com</description><link>https://bsky.app/profile/dalmeet.bsky.social</link><title>@dalmeet.bsky.social - Dalmeet Singh Chawla</title><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/dalmeet.bsky.social/post/3mtendbq6rk25</link><description>Hey, @learnedpublishing.bsky.social, I&#39;m not a scientist. Stop sending me peer review requests. Thanks. &#xA;&#xA;I tried to click &#34;decline&#34; but your site doesn&#39;t work.</description><pubDate>18 Aug 2026 16:31 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:nb72dsoyntabxtsuacqec6vc/app.bsky.feed.post/3mtendbq6rk25</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/dalmeet.bsky.social/post/3mrsax4rpx225</link><description>Papers with publicly available peer-review reports are less likely to be retracted than are those without public reports, a new study has found.&#xA;&#xA;My latest for @nature.com: &#xA;&#xA;https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-02282-1&#xA;&#xA;@aidybarnett.bsky.social, @jeroenson.bsky.social, @jessicapolka.bsky.social</description><pubDate>29 Jul 2026 15:37 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:nb72dsoyntabxtsuacqec6vc/app.bsky.feed.post/3mrsax4rpx225</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/dalmeet.bsky.social/post/3mrumcdl3hk2z</link><description>Around 400 U.S. patents contain at least one citation to a retracted scientific paper, a new study has found. &#xA;&#xA;My latest for @retractionwatch.com: &#xA;&#xA;https://retractionwatch.com/2026/07/30/us-patents-contain-citations-to-retracted-scientific-papers/</description><pubDate>30 Jul 2026 14:05 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:nb72dsoyntabxtsuacqec6vc/app.bsky.feed.post/3mrumcdl3hk2z</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/dalmeet.bsky.social/post/3mrsax4rpx225</link><description>Papers with publicly available peer-review reports are less likely to be retracted than are those without public reports, a new study has found.&#xA;&#xA;My latest for @nature.com: &#xA;&#xA;https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-02282-1&#xA;&#xA;@aidybarnett.bsky.social, @jeroenson.bsky.social, @jessicapolka.bsky.social</description><pubDate>29 Jul 2026 15:37 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:nb72dsoyntabxtsuacqec6vc/app.bsky.feed.post/3mrsax4rpx225</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/dalmeet.bsky.social/post/3mrglx5yw7226</link><description>Good to see that a report released this week by the White House OSTP cites my 2023 @nature.com article about the US National Science Foundation considering using &#39;golden tickets&#39; in their grant peer review system: www.whitehouse.gov/science/&#xA;&#xA;Here&#39;s the 2023 article: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00579-z</description><pubDate>25 Jul 2026 00:21 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:nb72dsoyntabxtsuacqec6vc/app.bsky.feed.post/3mrglx5yw7226</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/dalmeet.bsky.social/post/3molg55ayg22f</link><description>Professional rivalries, scandals and retractions mar graphyne research, but could the material be a promising one?&#xA;&#xA;My latest for @cenmag.bsky.social: &#xA;&#xA;https://cen.acs.org/research-integrity/graphyne-retractions-bad-blood-between-chemists/104/web/2026/06&#xA;&#xA;@arbitraryeffect.bsky.social, @alexrgroves.bsky.social, @uohaleylab.bsky.social, @cranfordmatter.bsky.social&#xA;&#xA;#ChemSky</description><pubDate>18 Jun 2026 18:05 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:nb72dsoyntabxtsuacqec6vc/app.bsky.feed.post/3molg55ayg22f</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/dalmeet.bsky.social/post/3mqrknqqeos23</link><description>NEW: @pubpeer.com to host thousands of replication studies in a bid to make them more visible. &#xA;&#xA;My latest for @nature.com: &#xA;&#xA;https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-02175-3&#xA;&#xA;@aufdroeseler.bsky.social, @forrt.bsky.social, @josefinaw.bsky.social</description><pubDate>16 Jul 2026 15:32 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:nb72dsoyntabxtsuacqec6vc/app.bsky.feed.post/3mqrknqqeos23</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/dalmeet.bsky.social/post/3mqpgnxhpds2o</link><description>SCOOP: ‘Poisoned’ datasets can trick #AI agents &#xA;&#xA;My latest for @nature.com: &#xA;&#xA;https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-02071-w&#xA;&#xA;@briannosek.bsky.social</description><pubDate>15 Jul 2026 19:16 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:nb72dsoyntabxtsuacqec6vc/app.bsky.feed.post/3mqpgnxhpds2o</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/dalmeet.bsky.social/post/3mqrknqqeos23</link><description>NEW: @pubpeer.com to host thousands of replication studies in a bid to make them more visible. &#xA;&#xA;My latest for @nature.com: &#xA;&#xA;https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-02175-3&#xA;&#xA;@aufdroeseler.bsky.social, @forrt.bsky.social, @josefinaw.bsky.social</description><pubDate>16 Jul 2026 15:32 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:nb72dsoyntabxtsuacqec6vc/app.bsky.feed.post/3mqrknqqeos23</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/dalmeet.bsky.social/post/3mqpgnxhpds2o</link><description>SCOOP: ‘Poisoned’ datasets can trick #AI agents &#xA;&#xA;My latest for @nature.com: &#xA;&#xA;https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-02071-w&#xA;&#xA;@briannosek.bsky.social</description><pubDate>15 Jul 2026 19:16 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:nb72dsoyntabxtsuacqec6vc/app.bsky.feed.post/3mqpgnxhpds2o</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/dalmeet.bsky.social/post/3mq5qeewgb22s</link><description>Neuropathologist Adriano Aguzzi is not guilty of research misconduct or negligence, a probe of three dozen studies at the University of Zurich has found. &#xA;&#xA;My latest for @thetransmitter.bsky.social: &#xA;&#xA;https://www.thetransmitter.org/ethics/neuropathologist-not-guilty-of-research-misconduct-says-university-probe-aguzzi/&#xA;&#xA;@elisabethbik.bsky.social, @charlespiller.bsky.social</description><pubDate>08 Jul 2026 18:21 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:nb72dsoyntabxtsuacqec6vc/app.bsky.feed.post/3mq5qeewgb22s</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/dalmeet.bsky.social/post/3mq5rn3yvt22v</link><description>A 1946 study that found that covering pipes with asbestos is not a dangerous occupation is facing a call for retraction.&#xA;&#xA;My latest for @cenmag.bsky.social: &#xA;&#xA;https://cen.acs.org/policy/publishing/navy-study-asbestos-retraction/104/web/2026/07&#xA;&#xA;#ChemSky</description><pubDate>08 Jul 2026 18:44 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:nb72dsoyntabxtsuacqec6vc/app.bsky.feed.post/3mq5rn3yvt22v</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/dalmeet.bsky.social/post/3mq5rn3yvt22v</link><description>A 1946 study that found that covering pipes with asbestos is not a dangerous occupation is facing a call for retraction.&#xA;&#xA;My latest for @cenmag.bsky.social: &#xA;&#xA;https://cen.acs.org/policy/publishing/navy-study-asbestos-retraction/104/web/2026/07&#xA;&#xA;#ChemSky</description><pubDate>08 Jul 2026 18:44 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:nb72dsoyntabxtsuacqec6vc/app.bsky.feed.post/3mq5rn3yvt22v</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/dalmeet.bsky.social/post/3mq5qeewgb22s</link><description>Neuropathologist Adriano Aguzzi is not guilty of research misconduct or negligence, a probe of three dozen studies at the University of Zurich has found. &#xA;&#xA;My latest for @thetransmitter.bsky.social: &#xA;&#xA;https://www.thetransmitter.org/ethics/neuropathologist-not-guilty-of-research-misconduct-says-university-probe-aguzzi/&#xA;&#xA;@elisabethbik.bsky.social, @charlespiller.bsky.social</description><pubDate>08 Jul 2026 18:21 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:nb72dsoyntabxtsuacqec6vc/app.bsky.feed.post/3mq5qeewgb22s</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/dalmeet.bsky.social/post/3mplwlvhse22m</link><description>Hidden prompts to detect #AI use in #PeerReview. &#xA;&#xA;That&#39;s what @neuripsconf.bsky.social organisers embedded in papers submitted to their conference. &#xA;&#xA;My latest for @thetransmitter.bsky.social:&#xA;&#xA;https://www.thetransmitter.org/publishing/scientists-decry-conferences-use-of-hidden-prompts-to-snare-ai-peer-reviews/</description><pubDate>01 Jul 2026 16:25 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:nb72dsoyntabxtsuacqec6vc/app.bsky.feed.post/3mplwlvhse22m</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/dalmeet.bsky.social/post/3mplwlvhse22m</link><description>Hidden prompts to detect #AI use in #PeerReview. &#xA;&#xA;That&#39;s what @neuripsconf.bsky.social organisers embedded in papers submitted to their conference. &#xA;&#xA;My latest for @thetransmitter.bsky.social:&#xA;&#xA;https://www.thetransmitter.org/publishing/scientists-decry-conferences-use-of-hidden-prompts-to-snare-ai-peer-reviews/</description><pubDate>01 Jul 2026 16:25 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:nb72dsoyntabxtsuacqec6vc/app.bsky.feed.post/3mplwlvhse22m</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/dalmeet.bsky.social/post/3molyvl6xpc2h</link><description>Professional rivalries, scandals, and retractions mar graphyne research, but can the material be a promising one? &#xA;&#xA;My latest for @cenmag.bsky.social: https://cen.acs.org/research-integrity/graphyne-retractions-bad-blood-between-chemists/104/web/2026/06&#xA;&#xA;#ChemSky</description><pubDate>18 Jun 2026 23:41 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:nb72dsoyntabxtsuacqec6vc/app.bsky.feed.post/3molyvl6xpc2h</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/dalmeet.bsky.social/post/3molyvl6xpc2h</link><description>Professional rivalries, scandals, and retractions mar graphyne research, but can the material be a promising one? &#xA;&#xA;My latest for @cenmag.bsky.social: https://cen.acs.org/research-integrity/graphyne-retractions-bad-blood-between-chemists/104/web/2026/06&#xA;&#xA;#ChemSky</description><pubDate>18 Jun 2026 23:41 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:nb72dsoyntabxtsuacqec6vc/app.bsky.feed.post/3molyvl6xpc2h</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/dalmeet.bsky.social/post/3molg55ayg22f</link><description>Professional rivalries, scandals and retractions mar graphyne research, but could the material be a promising one?&#xA;&#xA;My latest for @cenmag.bsky.social: &#xA;&#xA;https://cen.acs.org/research-integrity/graphyne-retractions-bad-blood-between-chemists/104/web/2026/06&#xA;&#xA;@arbitraryeffect.bsky.social, @alexrgroves.bsky.social, @uohaleylab.bsky.social, @cranfordmatter.bsky.social&#xA;&#xA;#ChemSky</description><pubDate>18 Jun 2026 18:05 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:nb72dsoyntabxtsuacqec6vc/app.bsky.feed.post/3molg55ayg22f</guid></item></channel></rss>