<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><description>Working on all things tax and econ policy for Bipartisan Policy Center.</description><link>https://bsky.app/profile/andrewlautz.bsky.social</link><title>@andrewlautz.bsky.social - Andrew Lautz</title><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/andrewlautz.bsky.social/post/3mjjqhxalsc23</link><description>It&#39;s Tax Day! Here&#39;s a thread on what we know about how the tax filing season has gone so far. 🧵&#xA;&#xA;REFUNDS: ⬆️ than last year, ⬇️ than some predicted. Current average is $3,462, which is $346 (11%) higher than 2025.&#xA;&#xA;Some were predicting $3,800 or $4,000+. Haven&#39;t seen that yet.</description><pubDate>15 Apr 2026 10:59 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:prwhtgnry2d3bkpyyb4elkew/app.bsky.feed.post/3mjjqhxalsc23</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/andrewlautz.bsky.social/post/3mimn6ekl4c25</link><description>The Trump admin&#39;s FY2027 budget request would cut IRS funding 13%, but not at equal levels:&#xA;&#xA;- Enforcement: 18% cut (-$0.9B) 📉&#xA;- Tech and Ops Support: 18% cut (-$0.6B) 📉&#xA;- Taxpayer Services: 3% increase (+$0.1B) 📈</description><pubDate>03 Apr 2026 21:13 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:prwhtgnry2d3bkpyyb4elkew/app.bsky.feed.post/3mimn6ekl4c25</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/andrewlautz.bsky.social/post/3mhgeegv3os2h</link><description>New from Fred Hernandez and I @bipartisanpolicy.org: should Congress increase taxes on sports betting?&#xA;&#xA;The Yale Budget Lab recently scored our 5% excise tax option as raising nearly $100B over 10.&#xA;&#xA;We dive in, with a 👀 at prediction markets as well.&#xA;&#xA;https://bipartisanpolicy.org/issue-brief/should-congress-increase-taxes-on-sports-betting/</description><pubDate>19 Mar 2026 15:54 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:prwhtgnry2d3bkpyyb4elkew/app.bsky.feed.post/3mhgeegv3os2h</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/andrewlautz.bsky.social/post/3mfnr6wiiyk26</link><description>The $1,776 military bonuses came from appropriations in the One Big Beautiful Bill, not tariff revenue.&#xA;&#xA;t.co/nSLJNdCo3K</description><pubDate>25 Feb 2026 03:42 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:prwhtgnry2d3bkpyyb4elkew/app.bsky.feed.post/3mfnr6wiiyk26</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/andrewlautz.bsky.social/post/3mfnotnxbak26</link><description>You can&#39;t balance the budget through cutting waste fraud and abuse alone.&#xA;&#xA;Entitlement spending and interest expense are driving our spending.</description><pubDate>25 Feb 2026 03:00 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:prwhtgnry2d3bkpyyb4elkew/app.bsky.feed.post/3mfnotnxbak26</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/andrewlautz.bsky.social/post/3mfno46ukvc2r</link><description>The Congressional Budget Office estimates that, even with the larger IEEPA tariffs now ruled illegal by SCOTUS, tariff revenues would only make up 6% of federal revenues over the next 10 years.</description><pubDate>25 Feb 2026 02:46 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:prwhtgnry2d3bkpyyb4elkew/app.bsky.feed.post/3mfno46ukvc2r</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/andrewlautz.bsky.social/post/3mfnnsp3auc2r</link><description>Here&#39;s what the tax cut looks like for someone claiming the overtime and/or tips deduction. At maximum amounts, it can lead to a tax cut of $6,000.&#xA;&#xA;For most taxpayers, it will be smaller, due to rules/limits.&#xA;&#xA;For more:&#xA;&#xA;https://bipartisanpolicy.org/explainer/the-2025-tax-bill-no-taxes-on-overtime-simplified/&#xA;&#xA;https://bipartisanpolicy.org/explainer/new-irs-rules-no-tax-on-tips/</description><pubDate>25 Feb 2026 02:41 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:prwhtgnry2d3bkpyyb4elkew/app.bsky.feed.post/3mfnnsp3auc2r</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/andrewlautz.bsky.social/post/3mfnnm3hfnc2r</link><description>On a nominal dollar basis, the One Big Beautiful Bill is the largest tax cut in history. As a share of GDP, the bipartisan deal to make the Bush tax cuts permanent was larger.</description><pubDate>25 Feb 2026 02:37 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:prwhtgnry2d3bkpyyb4elkew/app.bsky.feed.post/3mfnnm3hfnc2r</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/andrewlautz.bsky.social/post/3mfcrvfcv7k2d</link><description>Trump has announced he&#39;s using Sec. 122 to implement a &#34;global&#34; 10% tariff.&#xA;&#xA;Can last for up to 150 days (so perhaps July 20, 2026).&#xA;&#xA;Advantage of 122 is it requires no investigation and no waiting period. Disadvantage is it&#39;s capped at a 15% rate and 150 days.&#xA;&#xA;https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/20/trump-global-trade-tariff-supreme-court.html&#xA;&#xA;[contains quote post or other embedded content]</description><pubDate>20 Feb 2026 18:55 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:prwhtgnry2d3bkpyyb4elkew/app.bsky.feed.post/3mfcrvfcv7k2d</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/andrewlautz.bsky.social/post/3mfckrvdpu22h</link><description>Wondering where the Trump administration might go next after the SCOTUS ruling striking down IEEPA tariffs?&#xA;&#xA;We have a chart for you @bipartisanpolicy.org! Web version here: www.datawrapper.de/_/kvams/?v=5&#xA;&#xA;And thanks to @bbkogan.bsky.social for reminding me to post here more often :)</description><pubDate>20 Feb 2026 16:48 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:prwhtgnry2d3bkpyyb4elkew/app.bsky.feed.post/3mfckrvdpu22h</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/andrewlautz.bsky.social/post/3methzhxibk2k</link><description>Last night we got our first IRS update on the 2026 tax filing season. While it&#39;s too early to lock in trends:&#xA;&#xA;- Avg refund is $2,290, ⬆️ than most recent years&#xA;- 22M returns have been received, ⬇️ from recent years&#xA;- 127M have visited IRS.gov, ⬆️ from last year&#xA;&#xA;https://bipartisanpolicy.org/issue-brief/the-2026-tax-filing-season-what-to-know/</description><pubDate>14 Feb 2026 16:48 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:prwhtgnry2d3bkpyyb4elkew/app.bsky.feed.post/3methzhxibk2k</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/andrewlautz.bsky.social/post/3me2poa5oic24</link><description>We&#39;ve said before that this filing season will be a stress test on the IRS: funding cuts, staff reductions, OBBB changes (see next post).&#xA;&#xA;This story highlights an early response to that stress test: involuntary, 4-month reassignments of HR/IT staff to taxpayer services.&#xA;&#xA;[contains quote post or other embedded content]</description><pubDate>04 Feb 2026 20:29 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:prwhtgnry2d3bkpyyb4elkew/app.bsky.feed.post/3me2poa5oic24</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/andrewlautz.bsky.social/post/3me2atfonrc2r</link><description>New from us @bipartisanpolicy.org: crypto tax policy is a hot topic on Capitol Hill right now.&#xA;&#xA;We have some broad thoughts on how lawmakers should be thinking about de minimis, mining/staking, and more:&#xA;&#xA;https://bipartisanpolicy.org/issue-brief/how-should-cryptocurrency-be-taxed-bipartisan-principles-on-mining-staking-de-minimis-and-more/</description><pubDate>04 Feb 2026 16:03 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:prwhtgnry2d3bkpyyb4elkew/app.bsky.feed.post/3me2atfonrc2r</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/andrewlautz.bsky.social/post/3lqkvfvvtg22t</link><description>President Trump and Speaker Johnson have both called out the Congressional Budget Office&#39;s 1.8% economic growth assumption for the next decade.&#xA;&#xA;Setting aside the notion CBO does projections based on the party in power (they don&#39;t), growth has been on a clear downward trend for decades.</description><pubDate>01 Jun 2025 18:30 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:prwhtgnry2d3bkpyyb4elkew/app.bsky.feed.post/3lqkvfvvtg22t</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/andrewlautz.bsky.social/post/3llxa3aa7tc2o</link><description>Congress&#39; tax scorekeeper, JCT, is out with new scores today on the cost of extending the 2017 GOP tax cuts.&#xA;&#xA;JCT finds that extension costs $4.1 trillion over 10 years, and $700 billion more tacked on due to the extra interest payments we&#39;ll have to make on our debt.&#xA;&#xA;https://punchbowl.news/wyden_merkley_neal_boyle_release_new_estimate_of_republican_tax_planpdf/</description><pubDate>04 Apr 2025 01:07 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:prwhtgnry2d3bkpyyb4elkew/app.bsky.feed.post/3llxa3aa7tc2o</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/andrewlautz.bsky.social/post/3llupoe2pcc2b</link><description>New from Rachel Snyderman and I: &#xA;&#xA;What’s in the Senate GOP budget?&#xA;&#xA;💸 1) up to $5.7 TRILLION in higher deficits/debt&#xA;&#xA;🫣 2) an attempt to obscure a huge portion of that behind a &#34;current policy&#34; baseline that says tax cuts are free.&#xA;&#xA;Read more:&#xA;&#xA;https://bipartisanpolicy.org/explainer/whats-in-the-fy2025-senate-budget-resolution/</description><pubDate>03 Apr 2025 01:08 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:prwhtgnry2d3bkpyyb4elkew/app.bsky.feed.post/3llupoe2pcc2b</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/andrewlautz.bsky.social/post/3lloti5cnq22o</link><description>Happy baseline week. Remember: no budgetary rule can make $4.5 trillion in tax cuts cost $0!&#xA;&#xA;Current policy just obscures the cost from the public and breaks decades of precedent.</description><pubDate>31 Mar 2025 17:00 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:prwhtgnry2d3bkpyyb4elkew/app.bsky.feed.post/3lloti5cnq22o</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/andrewlautz.bsky.social/post/3lkvqgfbw7s2j</link><description>📈 Congressional Budget Office finds extending Trump tax cuts w/o pay-fors would increase debt to GDP by almost 50 percentage points by 2054.&#xA;&#xA;The baseline is a political choice, but it doesn&#39;t change that extending the tax cuts w/o paying for them adds trillions to debt.&#xA;&#xA;https://www.cbo.gov/publication/61255</description><pubDate>21 Mar 2025 17:29 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:prwhtgnry2d3bkpyyb4elkew/app.bsky.feed.post/3lkvqgfbw7s2j</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/andrewlautz.bsky.social/post/3lklw4sq6tc2r</link><description>The baseline debate is important because it&#39;s about transparency and honesty.&#xA;&#xA;What it doesn&#39;t change is that extending the 2017 tax cuts costs $4 trillion over a decade.&#xA;&#xA;Some friends here do a great job of explaining this for folks who aren&#39;t enmeshed in nerdy budget battles.&#xA;&#xA;[contains quote post or other embedded content]</description><pubDate>17 Mar 2025 19:44 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:prwhtgnry2d3bkpyyb4elkew/app.bsky.feed.post/3lklw4sq6tc2r</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/andrewlautz.bsky.social/post/3lkldt2dad222</link><description>Aaron Judge&#39;s contract pays $40 million this year, but the Yankees are just continuing his current contract so it actually costs $0.&#xA;&#xA;Sound ridiculous?&#xA;&#xA;This is the &#34;current policy&#34; gimmick some Republicans are mulling for tax cuts.&#xA;&#xA;Great metaphors here:&#xA;&#xA;https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2025/03/17/upshot/budget-baseline-metaphors-republicans.html?unlocked_article_code=1.4k4.VL20.NXtEK-j9cVbN&amp;smid=nytcore-ios-share&amp;referringSource=articleShare</description><pubDate>17 Mar 2025 14:17 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:prwhtgnry2d3bkpyyb4elkew/app.bsky.feed.post/3lkldt2dad222</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/andrewlautz.bsky.social/post/3lkgzymfhs22m</link><description>Me convincing myself my 401(k) balance isn&#39;t down if I don&#39;t check it:</description><pubDate>15 Mar 2025 21:10 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:prwhtgnry2d3bkpyyb4elkew/app.bsky.feed.post/3lkgzymfhs22m</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/andrewlautz.bsky.social/post/3lgskvuq5dc2w</link><description>The GOP&#39;s reconciliation bill is a moving target, and the menu of options changes daily.&#xA;&#xA;Currently, the agenda may exceed $7 trillion over 10 years before offsets.&#xA;&#xA;Lawmakers need to pay for new tax cuts/spending to avoid increasing deficits by a third.&#xA;&#xA;bipartisanpolicy.org/tcja-offsets/</description><pubDate>28 Jan 2025 13:31 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:prwhtgnry2d3bkpyyb4elkew/app.bsky.feed.post/3lgskvuq5dc2w</guid></item></channel></rss>