<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><description>Contributing editor @retractionwatch.com, formerly @Reuters_Health. I welcome tips. Views are my own.</description><link>https://bsky.app/profile/joelving.bsky.social</link><title>@joelving.bsky.social - Frederik Joelving</title><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/joelving.bsky.social/post/3ljsjegv6ek2j</link><description>Real-world politics is necessarily strategic. Nonetheless, bowing one’s head and treating Trump with deference normalizes his unacceptable and undignified behaviors https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/06/world/asia/new-zealand-uk-phil-goff-trump.html&#xA;https://nl.nytimes.com/f/newsletter/ws8vUzQQv1byx5jE6vBgSg~~/AAAAARA~/bIUs7mA0M7wrBdLeT5fekVAFn9WxE3mJIA2Rh8bpwSrCxfm3GOblJRJwOgtw-SKhOhjXSGlk3UHm7uLk0-HFcYjDXa-rPehdJ1aG68slz0CCqzondbUl-1EYAyoe4wofz8kj0NIptVT2I8PGw_CFf-s6q_eNRx5i1evp160xg56-XABwHEmi23tAgXS_qQr3</description><pubDate>07 Mar 2025 17:19 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:svasx7zib4bvohaq2f2g2d6q/app.bsky.feed.post/3ljsjegv6ek2j</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/joelving.bsky.social/post/3lhuvaollrk2v</link><description>Following our two investigations in @science.org (https://science.org/content/article/did-nasty-publishing-scheme-help-indian-dental-school-win-high-rankings &amp; https://science.org/content/article/shoddy-commentaries-quick-and-dirty-route-higher-impact-numbers-are-rise), @SIMATS_Univ in India has had more than 260 papers retracted, @retractionwatch.com&#39;s @averyorrall.bsky.social reports https://retractionwatch.com/2025/02/10/as-springer-nature-journal-clears-ai-papers-one-universitys-retractions-rise-drastically/</description><pubDate>11 Feb 2025 05:07 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:svasx7zib4bvohaq2f2g2d6q/app.bsky.feed.post/3lhuvaollrk2v</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/joelving.bsky.social/post/3lhl4ewgn5s2v</link><description>“Their intention was, we’re going to go open access, we need to publish everything,” Casanova said. “I cannot be instructed by a publisher to publish everything.” https://retractionwatch.com/2025/02/06/editors-resign-journal-clinical-immunology-journal-human-immunity-rockefeller/#more-130991</description><pubDate>07 Feb 2025 07:48 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:svasx7zib4bvohaq2f2g2d6q/app.bsky.feed.post/3lhl4ewgn5s2v</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/joelving.bsky.social/post/3lhg75syf7s22</link><description>Really feels like 1984&#xA;&#xA;[contains quote post or other embedded content]</description><pubDate>05 Feb 2025 08:54 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:svasx7zib4bvohaq2f2g2d6q/app.bsky.feed.post/3lhg75syf7s22</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/joelving.bsky.social/post/3lh6rufvoxc26</link><description>This is so scary.&#xA;&#xA;[contains quote post or other embedded content]</description><pubDate>02 Feb 2025 10:08 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:svasx7zib4bvohaq2f2g2d6q/app.bsky.feed.post/3lh6rufvoxc26</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/joelving.bsky.social/post/3lgzqc5c7xc2r</link><description>Good point, @mariahodges.bsky.social, editors&amp;peer reviewers have an extremely important job! Our piece does mention the many suspect papers T&amp;F has caught. Also, editors who catch these papers are doing their (paid) job, while sleuths are usually working on their own time, so there’s a difference.&#xA;&#xA;[contains quote post or other embedded content]</description><pubDate>31 Jan 2025 09:56 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:svasx7zib4bvohaq2f2g2d6q/app.bsky.feed.post/3lgzqc5c7xc2r</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/joelving.bsky.social/post/3lgv4tut5d22g</link><description>Check out our new deep dive on #papermills: Fake papers are contaminating the world’s scientific literature, fueling a corrupt industry and slowing legitimate lifesaving medical research https://theconversation.com/fake-papers-are-contaminating-the-worlds-scientific-literature-fueling-a-corrupt-industry-and-slowing-legitimate-lifesaving-medical-research-246224 @gcabanac.cpesr.fr</description><pubDate>29 Jan 2025 13:58 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:svasx7zib4bvohaq2f2g2d6q/app.bsky.feed.post/3lgv4tut5d22g</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/joelving.bsky.social/post/3lfmpvr5m5s2g</link><description>Inflating academic output “directly biases the outcomes of ranking systems, compromising their reliability and usefulness” https://retractionwatch.com/2025/01/10/bibliometrics-universities-publication-metrics-authorship/</description><pubDate>13 Jan 2025 12:20 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:svasx7zib4bvohaq2f2g2d6q/app.bsky.feed.post/3lfmpvr5m5s2g</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/joelving.bsky.social/post/3ldndsu72ok25</link><description>I&#39;m leaving my role @retractionwatch.com today to devote more time to other projects, but will continue as a contributing editor. Grateful for the 2 terrific years I spent working at this amazing organization on stories holding institutions and researchers to account.</description><pubDate>19 Dec 2024 07:26 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:svasx7zib4bvohaq2f2g2d6q/app.bsky.feed.post/3ldndsu72ok25</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/joelving.bsky.social/post/3ldlkupttpc2m</link><description>Publishing shoddy commentaries, with lots of self-citation, is a new way for universities in South Asia to manipulate metrics and rankings https://www.science.org/content/article/shoddy-commentaries-quick-and-dirty-route-higher-impact-numbers-are-rise</description><pubDate>18 Dec 2024 14:27 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:svasx7zib4bvohaq2f2g2d6q/app.bsky.feed.post/3ldlkupttpc2m</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/joelving.bsky.social/post/3lci5d6zsts2f</link><description>Careful what you wish for: &#34;In an August editorial, the editors acknowledged some of the increase in submissions the journal had seen “is related to ‘papermill’ type activity.”&#34; https://retractionwatch.com/2024/12/03/wiley-medical-journal-retracts-dozens-of-paper-for-manipulated-peer-review-with-more-to-come/</description><pubDate>04 Dec 2024 12:21 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:svasx7zib4bvohaq2f2g2d6q/app.bsky.feed.post/3lci5d6zsts2f</guid></item><item><link>https://bsky.app/profile/joelving.bsky.social/post/3lci543bzuc2u</link><description>Wiley medical journal retracts dozens of papers for manipulated peer review, with more to come https://retractionwatch.com/2024/12/03/wiley-medical-journal-retracts-dozens-of-paper-for-manipulated-peer-review-with-more-to-come/</description><pubDate>04 Dec 2024 12:17 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">at://did:plc:svasx7zib4bvohaq2f2g2d6q/app.bsky.feed.post/3lci543bzuc2u</guid></item></channel></rss>